GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

These pages are meant to complement the data and figures released within the GWTC-2 catalog with additional information produced with cWB.


Comparison between un-modeled and modeled waveform reconstructions: cWB vs LALInference

cWB is a wavelet-based burst method while LALInference is a parameter estimation method that uses the best available binary coalescence models. The comparisons shown here are performed between the cWB wavelet-based reconstruction and the LALInference results on the models listed in the GWTC-2 catalog.

Summary plots


cWB and LALInference(LI) comparisons on maximum likelihood reconstructed waveforms

Summary plots Content
Max likelihood whitened waveforms in time-domain
Max likelihood whitened waveform residuals in time-domain
90% skymaps (cWB vs CBC-PE skymaps)
cWB 90% confidence intervals (time-domain)
cWB 90% confidence intervals (frequency-domain)
cWB 90% confidence intervals (time envelope)
Strain noise amplitude spectral density

GW events

GW events reconstructed with standard settings are shown with a green badge, while those reconstructed with ad-hoc settings (e.g. ad-hoc production thresholds) are shown with an orange badge.

April 2019 May 2019 June 2019
July 2019 August 2019 September 2019